WWERKO1994 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

dude its limp bizkit not biscuit lol and limp bizkit is better

dubgalv (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Yeah really limp biscuit is shit compared to the who

XxdrippybuttfungasxX (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

yea i hate it wen ppl say limp buscuits version is better. they fucked up the song

Kinksforever (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

You cant compare this classic song whit Lbs version its so bad

quuNix (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

this song sucks LIVE?!

86970 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

dude turn your pc off take in a deep breath......I promise those feelings will go away

Joni0001984 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

David MeShow does a few covers, not this one, that is better than the original. Some modern artists use so much compression and try to sound so emotional that it is ridiculous.

timmyjonson (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

LB couldn't make a song like this worse as such, just more americanized. I respect him for seeing the oppurtunity to make a f*ckload of money, but there is seriously no comparison between the two. ORIGINAL IS ALWAYS BEST. If you disagree go f*ck yourslelf. And respect music for what it is.

philblunt420 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Fred Durst is a poser

denkinge (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I like both bands but the LB version is nothing compared to the original, durst voice is synthed in it this is original and live. Personally I would rather see Pete and Roger during the climax of this song sing back to back in the microphone than Limp Biscuit much respect though.