|
jarjarbinks77 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
So you think you have a valid point because you observe gravity's effect and not gravity directly. Gravity only refers to gravities effect. So run after your short bus and realize, that gravity speaks only of what we can sense. If you want to see what produces gravity that would be a graviton. Now if you had said newton wasn't able to see gravitons then you might of had a point. But just like the other stuff I mention I'm sure it will be a useless one.
1tabligh (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
"Cannot be felt or seen huh? You don't seem to know this ... gravity ... updated by Einstein .. general theory of relativity."You don't seem to know the difference between ***see gravity itself V/S observed effect of gravity.*** "Cannot be felt or seen huh?"Since you say gravity can be seen then tell me, WHAT COLOUR IS IT? blue, yellow, red ..etc?Did you miss the bus?Next time read carefully the text, understand the text and then **NO need to jump the gun!**well wisher
jarjarbinks77 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The only definition there has to be for early life, is that it must be self replicating. Plenty of amino acids floating around in the ocean. On such a microscopic level it is possible for trillions upon trillion of different combo's. Eventually these combo's formed a simple RNA strand, which can self replicate. At this point we have real life. Now evolution can take place. In our case a DNA structure evolving would have been highly beneficial and more likely to survive int he environment.
jarjarbinks77 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Cannot be felt or seen huh?You don't seem to know this but the theory of gravity has been updated by Einstein with his general theory of relativity.
BananaHurricane (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
8:15 Michael Jackson... lmao I like his sense of humor
cfmmrjeff (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The "moth illustration" is invalid!! It was staged and NOT proof for evolution.
1tabligh (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
It was observing the fortuitous fall of an apple from a tree that drew his attention to it. Physicists make great use of spectroscopy. They reckon the colours of the spectrum as ranging from red at the bottom to violet at the top. But they also acknowledge that innumerable colours exist both below red and above violet, all imperceptible to us.
1tabligh (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
God is imperceptible.Until the work of Isaac Newton no one knew anything about the mutual attraction of bodies which Newton expressed in his equations of gravitation. Gravitation cannot be seen, makes no sound, cannot be felt, tasted, or smelt. But since Newton, the laws of gravity have been part of the basic concepts with which science calculates. All our new industries make use of it. Yet Newton himself never saw the force which he quantified so ably. (Con't)
seathanaich (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Calling something that threatens your world view a "disease", without taking the time to find out about it, smacks of either ignorance or prejudice. Do you also call Islam a disease? Judaism? Scientific Method? Rational thought? All of these things either disagree with Christianity, or help to erode belief in it. Are they all diseases? Didn't Hitler call Jews a disease? Does it sadden you that you are no longer permitted to literally kill the "disease"? Final solution, anyone?
CrusoethePainter (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Found any of those civilizations yet? The Aztecs are FAR removed from the tribes described in the book of mormon. |
