ArrowHead83 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"it is absolutely real.. even whole Police department converted all their car to run on water... i got proof.."Then show me.

ArrowHead83 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Sure, we can come up with methods that take less energy. But not less than the energy you get back when you burn the hydrogen. Energy doesn't just appear out of nowhere.

HOW2driveCARonWATER (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

it is absolutely real.. even whole Police department converted all their car to run on water... i got proof.. and I got full instruction how to modify any car to use water as fuel if anybody looking for! ★★★★★ stars for the vid!

Shiffy180 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

i think youre wrong. and even if you are right, i believe that we can come up with methods of electrolysis that take less energy. ive heard more professionals take the side that burning hydrogen produces more energy than separating water requires but i intend to look into it and ask my professors. i'd just like to keep an open (but optimistic) mind until i learn things like this for myself for sure.

ArrowHead83 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"haha, water prices! nice one.so why dont all the car manufactures use this technology again?"Because it doesn't actually work. It's just a waste of gas. :D

ArrowHead83 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I'm glad there are SOME people out there who can still think for themselves!

ArrowHead83 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"just like a normal car where the running motor recharges the battery that it uses for ignition, the running motor in a water car recharges the battery that the car uses for electrolysis."But the energy gained from burning hydrogen is much less than the energy spent creating said hydrogen. It's a losing proposition.

ArrowHead83 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"my god. of course it requires energy input. it runs on water."In the context of the operation of this system, WATER HAS NO ENERGY."it doesnt claim to be a perpetual motion machine. [...] not perpetual motion, just efficient. thats all it claims to be."Explicitly, sure, it doesn't claim to be a perpetual motion machine. But that's exactly what it would have to be (see above).

Shiffy180 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

my god. of course it requires energy input. it runs on water. it doesnt claim to be a perpetual motion machine. just like a normal car where the running motor recharges the battery that it uses for ignition, the running motor in a water car recharges the battery that the car uses for electrolysis. not perpetual motion, just efficient. thats all it claims to be.

yocbjone (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

haha, water prices! nice one.so why dont all the car manufactures use this technology again?