NIKKKRED (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I think the real Jesus would crucify himself a thousand more times if he saw how America interprets Christianity...

jobw87 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Great job from America.

ExposingCondell2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

1. NascentAtheist's fearful and obscurant sock accounts, Dave0258/CAFoster58, have reared their ugly Heads. It's of little consequence; the truth cannot be muzzled. For any individual finding Nascent/Dave/CA's attempts at censorship insulting, a simple visit to my Channel- or a scroll back through the comments- will offer some impartial and academically sound analysis.

ExposingCondell2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

2. I have a policy- not unlike Nascent/Dave/CA's policy of refusing to comment on Theist Channels- of not responding to indivdiual comments on videos. However, i am more than willing to answer any question, and respond to any argument posted on my Channel.

ExposingCondell2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

3. I have rebutted Nascent/Dave/CAFoster's claims, that the Gospels included in the Brit Hadasha (NT) are equivalent with the Gnostic Gospels in a lack of historical authority. I have also included a link which destroys such arguments, in more elaborate detail.

ExposingCondell2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

4. As i am using sound sources - including critical secular historians such as William Foxwell Albright, who in 'Toward a More Conservative View' stated that the Gospels of the "NT" were penned "very probably sometime between about 50 A.D. and 75 A.D"- ...

ExposingCondell2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

5. ...and in light of the fact that one of the most skeptical Bible scholars in history, Sir William Mitchell Ramsay, admitted "Luke is a historian of the first rank. This author should be placed along with the very greatest historians. Luke's history is unsurpassed in respect of its trustworthiness",

ExposingCondell2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

6. ...and with regard to my complete honesty in everything i have asserted (as opposed to Condell's approach), i can only presume that Nascent-D/CA's obsessive desire to silence my opinions, and my rebuttals, is a product of fear.

ExposingCondell2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

7. Nascent-D/CA cannot be trusted. Time and again he shows himself to be biased, stunted in intellect, and rational- even denying the very historicity of Rabbi Yah'shua Ha'Nazaret (Jesus). Notoriously cynical John Dominic Crossan, of the Jesus Seminar, concedes Yah'shua was an historical individual: That he was crucified is as sure as anything historical can ever be. It is apparent Nascent/Dave/CAFoster58 is a radical among radicals- the fringe of the fringe.

ExposingCondell2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

8. What Nascent/Dave/CAFoster really doesn't want readers to know, is that the NT is so historically accurate- and reliable- as to have Luke use the word 'politarchas', in reference to Thessalonican city officials. Ignorant, spoon-fed cynics- a category into which, i am sure, we can comfortably assign Nascent/Dave/CA- had, for centuries, accused Luke (And, by implication, the Gospels) of erring due to Luke's dismissal of the more common 'strateegoi' and 'exousiais'.