theman4130 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

You make good point, but you never know. As it stands logically your right. I guess it just ticks me off that he dismisses this theory in a smug manner. In the end whatever.

theman4130 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I think I have heard this blogged here before. I will reinterate, Noam Chomsky is an intellectualist. I'm not defending him by any-means, however I don't waste my time with being upset over him not believing this theory. He can preach whatever he wants to, in the end I(the individual) am going to believe what I want to believe.

marionettehymnal (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

he's effeminate

ChopperSix (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"Anyone who doesn't agree with me that secret explosives in the buildings blew them up in a hyper-elaborate government ploy is an NWO gatekeeper shill paid by the government and Bilderberg. It's not like I have any evidence BUT THEY JUST ARE!!"Well, that pretty much sums up the entire argument of the Konspiracy Kunts, and lays out every bit of proof they've gathered in seven years.And they wonder why normal people laugh at them ....

bottomdogman (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

chomsky isn't gullible ? I just watched him being interviewed by Ali G. Fa real.

HairLikeCottonCandy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

All Chomsky said was that just because Bush stood to gain is not proof of conspiracy. He did not comment on whether or not there was any evidence that could link to a conspiracy.

metyzermanfan19 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Yeah because every professor at MIT is an idiot.. That actually makes me laugh. Get a fucking brain dipshit.

mmtot (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Build a straw man and debunk him good one Chromsky!

earthypig (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

my impression of chomsky just went up a notch.

undeadpresident (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

You're all going to hell.