rastamon1188 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

awesome presentation

stevieg1483 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

The neo classical style.

urban0023 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

first of all great presentation, very informative in the aspect of concept design, im not sure what the architect is going for but it seems like a control form of mess, anyhow design is a very subjective topic, good luck in the preliminary design and implementation on site. cheers!

georgewu5 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Compare to the CCTV in Beijing, this is architecture as the other is not! this office learned a lot from the Beijing project which is a very costly and wrongly situated project in an earthquake zone Beijing!---dancewu(dot)net

DragonToes13 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

did he say they used MS Paint... ? lol just messin with ya stevieg1483 lol - It's plain you;re right, but um nots like you can just design anything you want- unless you're flippin the bill lmao- Great vid Present.love it

DragonToes13 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

stevieg1483 and what style do you prefer? the limited edition Nazi Architecture? lol

stevieg1483 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

This type of architecture is decadent. It can't be compared to the classical style. It looks what it is, a mess. If it is still standing in 100 years or more people will think what the hell is that rubbish.

paxtioni1989 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

An interesting piece of architecture and put across to a public perspective very efficiently. i would love to be able to do most of this with my work. well done.

richardtraylor (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Read "Choosing a Skyline:How intelligently are we recognizing urban context as a feature ofenvironmental responsibility?" by Nicholas J. Slabbert -- it's available online on the "Virtual Adjacency" website. (You can also look it up in the British Library's list of online articles by N.J. Slabbert.)

Khalifornio (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

muy bueno en verdad