|
Delta10666 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
It's stupid. Bang, bang, bang, Why the heck show the same flashing sequence time after time after time? Once or twice is the maximum.This is a terrible edit.
stansherck (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
umm... ok.
TheMouseOfDeath (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I thought this was meant to be a joke when I first saw it, are you all sure it's not just someone being silly? (BANG!) At about 1:40 it just goes mad! (BANG!) So funny! (BANG!) I can't(BANG!) believe this (BANG!) was(BANG!) meant to (BANG!) be (BANG!) serious! (BANG!)(BANG!)(BANG!)(BANG BANG BANG BANG!!!) *really loud* (BANG!!!!!)
gintare439 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
nonsense
kat00003201 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
it gave me a headache you are using too much of the flikering effect...
bdyan1 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Lux Aeterna is so nice
ScorchinBeats (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
wow that was an annoying trailer
bronxbloggers (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Requiem for a Dream
dsamoa (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Can someone please tell me what the music in this trailer is called?
yallways (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The flash technique is supposed to be used just once or twice to put emphasis on a turning point or twist in the film... I think you need to keep your day job and stop editing stuff. It SUCKS and if I can make the word SUCKS and larger print then it would take up this whole page. |